sidebar

Connect: 319-210-7700

Connect: 319-210-7700

archive

Author: rafferty

The Fight for Talent

00:00 01 November in In the News by rafferty

by Kristen French and featured in Registered Rep November, 2010: When the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture was announced in January of 2009, Scott Mowry and his team, all former Legg Mason advisors, knew they were not sticking around to see how it would turn out. The group had been looking into joining an independent b/d for two years. They'd been through one major takeover already, when Smith Barney scooped up Legg, and had given the culture of a big Wall Street firm a try. It wasn't the right fit. The hasty, desperate dealmaking, the bad mortgages on both firms' books, the ugly headlines and the TARP handouts, these things just pushed them over the edge. So when the MSSB retention pacakges landed on their desks, they didn't put their pens to...

2009 Broker Dealer Winners and Losers: Who’s on Top, Who Missed the Mark

00:00 01 August in Articles Written by Jon Henschen by rafferty

by Jonathan Henschen, CFS and featured in Investment Advisor August, 2010: For independent broker dealers, 2009 is best described as a recruiting anomaly.The channel's high hopes to capitalize on the wirehouse fiasco never really materialized-- except for a few firms that had a history of attracting wirehouse reps, such as LPL, Raymond James and Wells Fargo Advisors. The primary triggers for independent gains were AIG, ING and former Pacific Life broker dealers purchased by LPL, the firms Mutual Service Corp, Waterstone and Associated Securities. There were healthy gainers in 2009, and some losses along the way. Here's my take on some of the winners and losers, and why. Who Came Out on Top As I evaluated 2009's highly successful firms, I set a few standards. First, I avoided small firms since adding just a few...

Fee Changes May Mean More Fee-Based Accounts

00:00 10 July in In the News by rafferty

by Daisey Maxey and featured in Dow Jones Newswire July, 2010: (New York) - A proposal by regulators to limit and shed more light on mutual-fund distribution charges won't, for the most part, affect brokers' overall compensation but could encourage more fee-based advisory business. Even if brokers were to see the proposal as a threat, they aren't likely to raise many complaints. The changes, proposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission this week, would restrict funds' ongoing sales charges to the highest fee charged by the fund for shares that have no ongoing sales charge. For example, if one share class of a fund charges a 4% front-end sales charge, another class couldn't charge more than 4% in total to investors over time. Funds could continue to pay 0.25% per year out of their assets...